If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone. They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause issues for users. A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue. However, because https://novelfelony9.bravejournal.net/post/2023/04/26/What-is-the-safest-distance-from-your-5G-cell-Tower transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer. Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is. Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them. But, https://note1s.com/notes/520RT00 showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems. This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating). The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards. Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
https://novelfelony9.bravejournal.net/post/2023/04/26/What-is-the-safest-distance-from-your-5G-cell-Tower|https://note1s.com/notes/520RT00
